Undrar också, kanske någon video han hade med som det blev strul med

NEEJ :| brb googla.

edit http://www.google.co.uk/suppor t/forum/p/youtube/thread?tid=0 d81b29c6d9b7c2e&hl=en

Hade inte ens märkt det, sjukt!

Brott mot upphovsrättslagen står det

Blir bannad med flest subscribers gg wp!

är det han som snor roliga videos och kommenterar dem så de blir skittråkiga?

#6 japp

Kan ha och göra med att han tjänar pengar på andras videor :)

#8 Han har ju gjort det i 2-3 år nu?

Det var på tiden.

dealwithit.jpg :D

fyfan vad bra

Fan va gött

#9 Jag vet inte riktigt varför men av det jag läst på fb så låter det som det handlar om det

Jonathan Reichert:
Then get on the ball and terminate IGN, Machinima, and Cisco and Ebert's accounts. You sir have made a big mistake terminating RWJ. Expect no mercy from us RWJ fans.

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
IGN, Machinima, and Cisco and Ebert really do the same thing as Ray did. /end sarcasm. I didn't close his account, by the way.

Jonathan Reichert:
They review copyrighted material, that is against the TOS by your terms.

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
Johnathan, just because he was number one doesn't make him immune to copyright strikes.

Jonathan Reichert:
I smell a lawsuit coming. And youtube losing many users. Also he made you guys most of your money. Since all youtube cares about money now adays

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
Johnathan, he can only sue the person who filed the claim, not YouTube.

Jonathan Reichert:
I am not saying anything about him being number one. I am saying there are thousands of other accounts doing movie, youtube viodeo, and video game reviews.

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
Look, video game reviews aren't braking any copyright nor are movie reviews IF they are under the "Fair Use" clause.

Milan Stanivuk: ‎
It's because he is making money out of them.

Jonathan Reichert:
You ever hear about the story about how ICP got out of thier disney contract? Google it. Expect the same to happen with this whole situation

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
Right! At least someone understands it. Thanks, MIlan.

Sylvester Michael Johnson:
Jonathan, I don't have time to do that right now, but if there is going to be a
counterclaim, let it be.

Claudia Maria Kelly:
he got her more views and her video has an ad on it so she was making money... she should be thankful!

Jf Beaulieu:
rofl so then if you made a video and had a potential chance to make money from it, and along comes this guy with a pompous look on his face, takes ur video and starts to make money from it, you wouldn't in the lease wonder why ur not making money from a video you made and/or caught on film urself? please don't kid urself


Edit:
https://www.facebook.com/youtu be/posts/334370296578786

Här läs själva :p

Han är dock inte bannad längre?

#15 stämmer :-)

Hade varit rätt åt köttet >.< men nu va han visst unbannad

Hatar honom så inga problem

Förmodligen haft musik i någon video utan tillåtelse.

Han hade ju köpt subscribers!

Fan vad gött, hatar den killen så jävla hårt. Tillgjord, överdriven och passé.

vem?

Synd för honom att han blev bannad, men ärligt, tycker han är sjukt tråkig. Fattar inte hur han kan ha över 100 subscribers ens. :P