1
Jordens undergång 2012=Fake
Postat av sF-FrAg[A]rN den 2 Maj 2009, 03:45
73 kommentarer · 10 899 träffar
Tjenare har grävt ner mig i detta ämnet i några timmar nu här på kvällskvisten och jag har hittat bevis från forskare från Nasa och filmbevis. Se filmerna och läs texterna som jag nu ger er. Ni behöver inte tro detta ifall ni inte vill men jag kan lova er att man mår lite bättre när man läser och hör att detta bara är en stor bluff. Är det någonting ni vill fråga så svarar jag gärna på det.
---------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------------
http://www.disclose.tv/action/ viewvideo/8851/Relax__2012_doo msday_is_a_bullshit_ /
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =F8MpUeh2KMI
---------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------
Text tagen från en kommentar av en forskare från Nasa. Texterna är kanske inte sanna men tro vad ni vill.
I am really sorry that these crazy Nibiru claims have upset you. I don't want to keep answering these questions about Nibiru, but let me say once more as clearly as I can, for you and the other questioners: Nibiru does not exist. NASA has never discovered or detected Nibiru or anything remotely like it. The handful of dwarf planets that astronomers have discovered beyond Neptune are on stable orbits that will never come into the inner solar system, let alone threaten Earth. Nothing will happen in 2012. Nibiru is simply a fake, a hoax, the result of a small religious cult that is unfortunately scaring lots of people with totally false stories. David Morrison
NAI Senior Scientist
January 31, 2008
---------------------------- ------------------------------ -----------------
Annan kommentar av David Morrison.
I hope this is my last comment on the Nibiru hoax, but questions like the above six keep coming in. Most of the entries on the Internet about Nibiru are false. Wikipedia has it correct when they write that "Nibiru is a name in Sumerian, Babylonian astrology associated with the god Marduk, generally accepted as referring to the planet Jupiter." The rest is a hoax, including all the "stuff" questioner #! found on the internet. Questioners #2 and #3 mention the astronomical observatory at the South Pole, but I assure you these astronomers are not looking at Nibiru. The Antarctic is a great place for astronomical infrared and short-wave-radio observations, and it also has the advantage that objects can be observed continuously without the interference of the day-night cycle. If the questioner really thinks that Nibiru is visible in the daytime in the southern hemisphere, they are very confused; this sort of statement is obviously false. Questioners #3 and #4 seem to think that the government would hide information about Nibiru and the catastrophe supposedly due in a few years, but I can't imagine why. My experience is, in fact, that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time. In any case, the job of NASA scientists is to discover and tell the truth! Questioner (5) asks if Nibiru is the same as Eris, and the answer is an emphatic no. This Nibiru hoax has been around for a decade, including predictions that Nibiru would pass close to Earth and cause a catastrophe about 5 years ago. (Guess what: it didn't happen!). Eris, in contrast, is one of several dwarf planets recently found by astronomers in the outer part of out solar system, all of them on normal orbits that will never bring them close to Earth. There is a good write-up on Eris in Wikipedia. Finally, Questioner (6) asks me to identify two pictures. I could perhaps do so if I knew the type of telescope and camera used and the scale of photos. Without that information, I can only guess that (if these photos are real) these might be images of a gas cloud (nebula) ejected by a star in its old age. They are obviously very distant, since we see stars in the foreground superposed on the nebula. Also, since the stars are the same, this object (if it is real) has not moved between the dates of the two photos. It is just crazy that anyone would claim that these are photos of a planet in our own solar system. Let me say once again that Nibiru is a hoax promoted by a cult; it does not exist, and it certainly poses no threat to us. It saddens me that people would be taken in by such nonsense. David Morrison
NAI Senior Scientist
February 7, 2008
---------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------
Kommentarerna hittade jag på Nasa då jag sökte på "Nibiru" på deras sökmotor och där kan ni hitta all möjlig information som motbevisar jordens undergång. Ni alla kan göra det med en enkel sökning och ni behöver bara gå in på http://www.nasa.gov
Nu hoppas jag att ni kan ta det lungt och sluta vara oroliga över någonting som inte kommer hända.
MVH FragarN
---------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------------
http://www.disclose.tv/action/ viewvideo/8851/Relax__2012_doo msday_is_a_bullshit_ /
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =F8MpUeh2KMI
---------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------
Text tagen från en kommentar av en forskare från Nasa. Texterna är kanske inte sanna men tro vad ni vill.
I am really sorry that these crazy Nibiru claims have upset you. I don't want to keep answering these questions about Nibiru, but let me say once more as clearly as I can, for you and the other questioners: Nibiru does not exist. NASA has never discovered or detected Nibiru or anything remotely like it. The handful of dwarf planets that astronomers have discovered beyond Neptune are on stable orbits that will never come into the inner solar system, let alone threaten Earth. Nothing will happen in 2012. Nibiru is simply a fake, a hoax, the result of a small religious cult that is unfortunately scaring lots of people with totally false stories. David Morrison
NAI Senior Scientist
January 31, 2008
---------------------------- ------------------------------ -----------------
Annan kommentar av David Morrison.
I hope this is my last comment on the Nibiru hoax, but questions like the above six keep coming in. Most of the entries on the Internet about Nibiru are false. Wikipedia has it correct when they write that "Nibiru is a name in Sumerian, Babylonian astrology associated with the god Marduk, generally accepted as referring to the planet Jupiter." The rest is a hoax, including all the "stuff" questioner #! found on the internet. Questioners #2 and #3 mention the astronomical observatory at the South Pole, but I assure you these astronomers are not looking at Nibiru. The Antarctic is a great place for astronomical infrared and short-wave-radio observations, and it also has the advantage that objects can be observed continuously without the interference of the day-night cycle. If the questioner really thinks that Nibiru is visible in the daytime in the southern hemisphere, they are very confused; this sort of statement is obviously false. Questioners #3 and #4 seem to think that the government would hide information about Nibiru and the catastrophe supposedly due in a few years, but I can't imagine why. My experience is, in fact, that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time. In any case, the job of NASA scientists is to discover and tell the truth! Questioner (5) asks if Nibiru is the same as Eris, and the answer is an emphatic no. This Nibiru hoax has been around for a decade, including predictions that Nibiru would pass close to Earth and cause a catastrophe about 5 years ago. (Guess what: it didn't happen!). Eris, in contrast, is one of several dwarf planets recently found by astronomers in the outer part of out solar system, all of them on normal orbits that will never bring them close to Earth. There is a good write-up on Eris in Wikipedia. Finally, Questioner (6) asks me to identify two pictures. I could perhaps do so if I knew the type of telescope and camera used and the scale of photos. Without that information, I can only guess that (if these photos are real) these might be images of a gas cloud (nebula) ejected by a star in its old age. They are obviously very distant, since we see stars in the foreground superposed on the nebula. Also, since the stars are the same, this object (if it is real) has not moved between the dates of the two photos. It is just crazy that anyone would claim that these are photos of a planet in our own solar system. Let me say once again that Nibiru is a hoax promoted by a cult; it does not exist, and it certainly poses no threat to us. It saddens me that people would be taken in by such nonsense. David Morrison
NAI Senior Scientist
February 7, 2008
---------------------------- ------------------------------ -------------------
Kommentarerna hittade jag på Nasa då jag sökte på "Nibiru" på deras sökmotor och där kan ni hitta all möjlig information som motbevisar jordens undergång. Ni alla kan göra det med en enkel sökning och ni behöver bara gå in på http://www.nasa.gov
Nu hoppas jag att ni kan ta det lungt och sluta vara oroliga över någonting som inte kommer hända.
MVH FragarN






